Back
Year : 2018 | Volume : 6 | Issue : 2 | Page : 79 - 82  


Original Articles
Ksharasutra vs. fistulectomy for fistula in ano – A Randomized Controlled Trial in East Godavari district, Andhra Pradesh, India

KL Narasimha Rao1, Lavanya KM2, Samir Ranjan Nayak3, P Ashrith 4

1 & 3 Associate Professor, 4Senior Resident, Department of General Surgery, GSL Medical College, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India

2Associate Professor, Department of Community Medicine, GSL Medical College, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India

*Corresponding Author

Email: doclavanyarao@gmail.com

Abstract:

Background: Anal fistula (plural fistulae), or fistula-in-ano, is a chronic abnormal communication between the epithelialized surface of the anal canal and (usually) the perianal skin. The conventional laying – open will lead to division of most of the anal sphincter muscles resulting in incontinence, thus making anal fistulae, especially high anal fistulae difficult to treat.

Objective: This study attempts to compare the two techniques, fistulectomy and Ksharasutra in the treatment of fistula-in-ano.

Methods: A Randomized Controlled study with 168 patients of fistula in ano was conducted in a tertiary care hospital, Rajahmundry. All those with low anal fistulae were included in the study. Chi square test was used to compare categorical variables. Independent t-test was used to analyze the difference among continuous variables. A P-value of < 0.05 is considered statistically significant and 0.000 is very highly statistically significant.

Results: Most of the patients 84 (50%) belonged to 30 – 39 years. Mean age was 34.6 years in fistulectomy patients and 36.7 years in ksharasutra treatment group. Most of them 131 (78%) were males. Majority of the patient had single external opening 148 (88%). Most of the external openings were located postero-lateral 109 (65%). MRI showed that 128 (76%) cases had inter-sphincteric fistulae, 35 (21%) trans-sphincteric fistulae and 5 (3%) sub mucosal fistulae. Ksharasutra required significantly (p = 0.000) lesser duration for surgery, experienced significantly (= 0.000) less pain post-operatively. The mean duration of healing was significantly (p 0.000) more (34.95+1.8 days) in Ksharasutra group. Ksharasutra group had significantly (P = 0.000) few days off-work. Ksharasutra required significantly (P 0.000) lesser duration of hospital stay. Cost incurred in rupees was comparatively lesser Rs.1200 for Ksharasutra. The recurrence rate at 1 year was 2 (2.38%) with ksharasutra which is significantly (P 0.000) lower compared to 6 (7.14%) with fistulectomy. Only four cases (4.76%) of incontinence were seen, of which, one (1.2%) case of major incontinence occurred in fistulectomy group.

Conclusion: Ksharasutra is a better alternative to fistulectomy in the treatment of fistula in ano, in terms of duration of surgery, pain, hospital stay, cost, post-operative discharge, time for healing, days of absence from work and post-operative complications such as incontinence and recurrence.

Key words: Fistula-in-ano, Fistulectomy, Ksharasutra, Randomized control trial





img

Important links

adv apply rec

Open Access Journal

MRIMS Journal of Health Sciences is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher of the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.

Visitor Count


376147
© 2019 Chandramma Education society . All Rights Reserved.